Sep 6th, 2012

till—im—made—of—stone:

slowdown777:

till—im—made—of—stone:

holditdown-youngpadawong:

slowdown777:

When the woman that invented Birth Control….

Believes in eugenics and said we needed birth control to “assist the race of the elimination of the unfit” how could you possibly believe that abortion wasn’t and isn’t a form of genocide? Although she didn’t directly believe in…

more of why i hate people

Jesus Christ.

If this isn’t blatant, malicious misinformation and misrepresentation for the purpose of furthering a misguided cause, then I don’t know what is.

You can’t honestly sit there and call a girl racist for wanting control of HER. OWN. FUCKING. BODY. Don’t sit there and tell a rape victim “You’re such a racist, white supremacist for killing this baby. You’re murdering an innocent child through Eugenics.” Fucking NO. She doesn’t want to have a child with the man who raped her! Get that through your tiny warped skull.

You can’t seriously believe that birth control is racist, right? Like……. just… I can’t even wrap my head around that. So that must mean condoms are racist too right? Or is it just the women?

No. A man wanting control of his fertility is totally cool and allowed. Because that would be wrong to force him to have a kid that he doesn’t want. Which means if the condom fails, he has plausible deniability and can walk away.

Ahh now we’re getting to the bottom of this. This isn’t about race at all. No. It never was. It’s about a woman’s right to control her body and to have kids when she wants. In this day and age, being called a racist is just about the worse thing you can be called. So by calling a woman a racist for wanting to have control over her own fertility, you are essentially scaring her into into relinquishing said control out of fear of being publicly known as a racist.

Damn. That’s about the worst case of insidious misogyny I’ve ever heard of. Because if this twisted little idea… rhetoric, whatever the fuck you want to call it, actually becomes a ’ thing ’ then women can have their fertility rights completely taken away from them. And if she has a back alley abortion, not only will she be committing a hate crime based on race (even if the baby is of a non African ethnicity) which is a felony, but she will also be committing murder in the first degree. Also a felony with jail time of 20 to life if she isn’t given the death penalty.

Hello, welcome to pre-women’s rights. Where women are property and not treated as equal humans. Where she has ZERO personal freedoms, besides what her husband, or dominant male family member, allows her, if at all. And what personal freedoms are so generously gifted to her (that’s sarcasm) can be just as easily taken away.

By stripping a woman of her fertility rights, that’s a HUGE step in that direction. You may as well ask to have all women’s rights stripped away then, because all you are is a blatant misogynist without a care to women’s well being and personal freedoms.

Sorry, bud. But that centuries old mindset is NOT going to fly in this modern day and age.

For starters! I NEVER SAID a woman that has an abortion was a racist!

My point was that birth control was created by a woman (who opened a BIRTH CONTROL clinic in the middle of HARLEM) who believed that birth control could be used to control the population of a race.

On going, when you look at the statistics of abortion, BLACK WOMEN are a majority of the victims.  Abortion was created to prevent a race from expanding.  I guess they eventually considered that Black women weren’t even smart enough to use birth control to abortion came along to take care of all the ones that got through.

“You cannot tell me that birth control and abortion are okay without sounding like a racist.” Those are YOUR words in your original post. Sorry, but that translates into “If you are using birth control, or have an abortion, you are supporting Margaret Sanger’s alleged ‘racist ideals’”. So, yes. That is indirectly calling a woman a racist. At least grow some balls and say what you really mean. 

First of all. Birth control has been used for thousands of years. Whether through sheepskin condoms (I’m not even going to get into the Vikings using the skin of their enemies as condoms), but also through women using herbs to disrupt their menstruation and fertility. Oh yeah. There’s also that minor thing called The Rhythm Method. Crude forms of abortion have been used in the past. Some women would hit their stomachs until the trauma aborted the child, or they brewed/consumed an herb that caused contractions.

African [American] women already had their forms of birth control that had been passed down for generations. All Margaret Sanger did was provide a safer, more reliable method. One that didn’t endanger them or affect their fertility later on. Explain to me how that is racist?

Abortion being made available to black women does not equate to genocide. Because not every black woman was being forced into abortion. THEY were choosing it for themselves. The issue was after care. That wasn’t being provided because legal abortion was still a new medical procedure, one that still had it’s kinks and nobody foresaw that becoming a prominent issue. WHITE women weren’t even offered after care. Explain to me how that’s racist.

Margaret was racist. But she didn’t create the ‘Negro Project’ to just rid the world of black people. She lived in a time where anybody who didn’t fit a certain criteria could be killed and nobody cared otherwise. What she had planned, didn’t work. A blessing in disguise, because now women have safer forms of control over their own fertility. Times have changed since then, which means it’s time for you to move on.

Want to know why you can’t? (Explain why birth control and abortion are racist.) Because it’s not. Planned Parenthood is being led by people who provide this for ALL women of race. It is no longer thought of has a plan to rid the world of the ‘unfit’. Which takes us back to my previous point. This isn’t about race at all. It’s about stripping sentient, independent women of their fertility rights because you have a twisted idea about a fetus’ rights over a woman’s.

Like I said. This only makes you a misogynist and nothing more.

If you actually want to educate people about abortion and birth control, you might want to read up about it yourself before opening your mouth and spreading fear through misinformation on a site chock full of people who know more about this than you realize.

The fact that you claim to be a born again Christian and your pro choice concludes enough about you.  Good luck facing God with those beliefs.

(via kissmyfatsass)

Sep 3rd, 2012

till—im—made—of—stone:

holditdown-youngpadawong:

slowdown777:

When the woman that invented Birth Control….

Believes in eugenics and said we needed birth control to “assist the race of the elimination of the unfit” how could you possibly believe that abortion wasn’t and isn’t a form of genocide? Although she didn’t directly believe in…

more of why i hate people

Jesus Christ.

If this isn’t blatant, malicious misinformation and misrepresentation for the purpose of furthering a misguided cause, then I don’t know what is.

You can’t honestly sit there and call a girl racist for wanting control of HER. OWN. FUCKING. BODY. Don’t sit there and tell a rape victim “You’re such a racist, white supremacist for killing this baby. You’re murdering an innocent child through Eugenics.” Fucking NO. She doesn’t want to have a child with the man who raped her! Get that through your tiny warped skull.

You can’t seriously believe that birth control is racist, right? Like……. just… I can’t even wrap my head around that. So that must mean condoms are racist too right? Or is it just the women?

No. A man wanting control of his fertility is totally cool and allowed. Because that would be wrong to force him to have a kid that he doesn’t want. Which means if the condom fails, he has plausible deniability and can walk away.

Ahh now we’re getting to the bottom of this. This isn’t about race at all. No. It never was. It’s about a woman’s right to control her body and to have kids when she wants. In this day and age, being called a racist is just about the worse thing you can be called. So by calling a woman a racist for wanting to have control over her own fertility, you are essentially scaring her into into relinquishing said control out of fear of being publicly known as a racist.

Damn. That’s about the worst case of insidious misogyny I’ve ever heard of. Because if this twisted little idea… rhetoric, whatever the fuck you want to call it, actually becomes a ’ thing ’ then women can have their fertility rights completely taken away from them. And if she has a back alley abortion, not only will she be committing a hate crime based on race (even if the baby is of a non African ethnicity) which is a felony, but she will also be committing murder in the first degree. Also a felony with jail time of 20 to life if she isn’t given the death penalty.

Hello, welcome to pre-women’s rights. Where women are property and not treated as equal humans. Where she has ZERO personal freedoms, besides what her husband, or dominant male family member, allows her, if at all. And what personal freedoms are so generously gifted to her (that’s sarcasm) can be just as easily taken away.

By stripping a woman of her fertility rights, that’s a HUGE step in that direction. You may as well ask to have all women’s rights stripped away then, because all you are is a blatant misogynist without a care to women’s well being and personal freedoms.

Sorry, bud. But that centuries old mindset is NOT going to fly in this modern day and age.

For starters! I NEVER SAID a woman that has an abortion was a racist!

My point was that birth control was created by a woman (who opened a BIRTH CONTROL clinic in the middle of HARLEM) who believed that birth control could be used to control the population of a race.

On going, when you look at the statistics of abortion, BLACK WOMEN are a majority of the victims.  Abortion was created to prevent a race from expanding.  I guess they eventually considered that Black women weren’t even smart enough to use birth control to abortion came along to take care of all the ones that got through.

(via kissmyfatsass)

Sep 3rd, 2012 therealdealwithbillmcneal: Why do you hate the president so much? Hes a good man.

Considering you didn’t put any hate comments in that message I will assume you are being sarcastic!

Sep 3rd, 2012 half-hanged-mary: You said rape abortions account for less than one percent, but you do realize that no matter what the number is, it still counts. You're basically saying "oh they're raped women. But they don't abort as much. Let's not care about the raped women" THEY STILL COUNT.

You are right, they do still count.  As a Christian I believe that  God take care of that small percentage of abortions.  The reason it seems like I don’t think that percentage counts is because A LOT of pro choice campaigners use Life of the mother, rape, and incest to push they points about being pro choice, when in reality those cases are such a small percentage compared to the big picture.

Sep 2nd, 2012
When the woman that invented Birth Control….

Believes in eugenics and said we needed birth control to “assist the race of the elimination of the unfit” how could you possibly believe that abortion wasn’t and isn’t a form of genocide?  Although she didn’t directly believe in Abortion, once she died they sure had a feed in to increase the racist ideas she once had.  Why just have birth control when we can just kill them!

She didn’t call her place PLANNED PARENTHOOD, she called it the NEGRO PROJECT.  

So birth control originated from a little plan white americans called the NEGRO PROJECT.  You cannot tell me that birth control and abortion are ok without sounding like a racist.  

If the large statistics of aborting  unborn Black babies isn’t getting rid of a race then how about the percentage of those Black women that commit suicide after the abortion?

They get two for the price of one!

It’s genocide and racially fueled to ‘assist the race of the elimination of the unfit’

Margaret Sanger didn’t want the world to think that it looked like ‘they were attempting to rid the world of the negro race’ but I’ll be damned if it looked like anything else!

Aug 17th, 2012

damegreywulf:

slowdown777:

fortheloveof-whores:

slowdown777:

You think the baby has no emotions, but they can hear you talking about aborting them!

So you want to argue that a fetus has no emotion and is a blob of cells? Well I guess they won’t feel you killing them but they sure will hear you talking about…

What makes me laugh the most about responders like you is that you have to take things do literally, and they say us Christians are stupid for being so literal about the bible. 
Apparently the use of a hyperbole is to complex for the sack of cells inside your head.

You can’t excuse being wrong with “I was just exaggerating”. You were being emotionally manipulative and outright misinformative.

Using a hyperbole doesn’t just relate to exaggeration, but more importantly to something that isn’t supposed to be taken literally!

Aug 17th, 2012

a-phoenix-inside:

slowdown777:

a-phoenix-inside:

lostpoeticethic:

ohlookanotherfeminist:

slowdown777:

So you want to argue that a fetus has no emotion and is a blob of cells? Well I guess they won’t feel you killing them but they sure will hear you talking about it!!!



Week 8: Every organ is in place, bones begin to replace…

Your sack of cells you call a brain on the other hand doesn’t seem to comprehend that the pro-life movement relies on emotional manipulation.
So if your post wasn’t a serious one, forgive us for not immediately realising, for it’s the only one of its kind.

Yes, because the baby definitely has comprehension skills. Right on. Dude, get educated. As tiny as the baby is at 8 weeks everything sounds muffled. Probably because you know, they’re in a fluid-filled bubble essentially.

What makes me laugh the most about responders like you is that you have to take things do literally, and they say us Christians are stupid for being so literal about the bible. 
Apparently the use of a hyperbole is to complex for the sack of cells inside your head.

As far as I know, you are not a mother and have never been pregnant. Had you ever been pregnant, you’d maybe feel different. No one should be FORCED to carry a child that they do no want. Unlike you, I’ve seen my actual baby at 7 weeks along. I saw and heard her heartbeat. I cried, it was beautiful. But I WANTED her. Therein lies the difference. Other than that, she was a little twitching blob on the screen. There was nothing else to her besides an egg sack, a heartbeat and mass of cell that would soon be her body. No limbs yet and her head hadn’t even made itself seperate from the rest of her body. And FYI: fetuses don’t really begin to hear anything besides their mother’s heartbeat until 16 weeks. Get your facts straight.

I am actually 10 weeks pregnant and I have had a miscarriage in the past. So I do know what it is like to see and hear those things.  If people don’t want a child they should NOT GET PREGNANT in the first place.  I don’t want a lot of people around but I don’t just go killing everyone in my life that I don’t want.  There is no difference between taking the life of a fetus then taking the life of anyone else.  

Aug 1st, 2012
This is how Obama feels about your ‘American Dream’, remember then when it’s time to VOTE!
Aug 1st, 2012

a-phoenix-inside:

lostpoeticethic:

ohlookanotherfeminist:

slowdown777:

So you want to argue that a fetus has no emotion and is a blob of cells? Well I guess they won’t feel you killing them but they sure will hear you talking about it!!!



Week 8: Every organ is in place, bones begin to replace…

Your sack of cells you call a brain on the other hand doesn’t seem to comprehend that the pro-life movement relies on emotional manipulation.
So if your post wasn’t a serious one, forgive us for not immediately realising, for it’s the only one of its kind.

Yes, because the baby definitely has comprehension skills. Right on. Dude, get educated. As tiny as the baby is at 8 weeks everything sounds muffled. Probably because you know, they’re in a fluid-filled bubble essentially.

What makes me laugh the most about responders like you is that you have to take things do literally, and they say us Christians are stupid for being so literal about the bible. 
Apparently the use of a hyperbole is to complex for the sack of cells inside your head.

Aug 1st, 2012

a-phoenix-inside:

lostpoeticethic:

ohlookanotherfeminist:

slowdown777:

So you want to argue that a fetus has no emotion and is a blob of cells? Well I guess they won’t feel you killing them but they sure will hear you talking about it!!!



Week 8: Every organ is in place, bones begin to replace…

Your sack of cells you call a brain on the other hand doesn’t seem to comprehend that the pro-life movement relies on emotional manipulation.
So if your post wasn’t a serious one, forgive us for not immediately realising, for it’s the only one of its kind.

Yes, because the baby definitely has comprehension skills. Right on. Dude, get educated. As tiny as the baby is at 8 weeks everything sounds muffled. Probably because you know, they’re in a fluid-filled bubble essentially.

What makes me laugh the most about responders like you is that you have to take things do literally, and they say us Christians are stupid for being so literal about the bible. 
Apparently the use of a hyperbole is to complex for the sack of cells inside your head.